Saturday, November 22, 2014

Yet Another Combined Sewer Overflow in Atlanta

Yet another big public works project


Fails in less than a year (scroll down a few articles)


As an aside, I note with interest that this spill isn't more broadly reported. Who knows how many of these overflows happen with every storm in Atlanta. 

Targeted rainwater harvesting in the appropriate watershed is the fastest and least expensive method for reducing stormwater surges. Controls can be added to utilize the water before the next rain, or just put a small hole in the tank to release the water over a few days. 

If the release was from overflow, then the 5500 gallon spill could have been prevented for as little as $5000. When is Georgia going to realize that big public works projects are no longer the solution?

Why won't government incentivize property owners to install cisterns? Is it a lack of supporting federal funding? Cronyism? Lack of experience?

Rainwater is a resource, not a problem to be managed. 

Tuesday, October 7, 2014


Where Does Drinking Water Come From?

Take a large body of water


Use solar power to desalinate and purify it.


Transport it using wind energy


And deliver it weekly


This is the where most drinking water comes from. 

Question is: do you want the last miles to be this:


to where it's treated, 

and then pumped through this


Or is it better to pick it up here


put it directly into here


and treat the water as it's used?




Thursday, August 14, 2014

Stormwater Management Costs in Atlanta, Roswell, and Hapeville


We are working on a project for one of these cities. All the stormwater management requirements are about the same for these cities: green roofs, permeable pavement, retention ponds, or rainwater harvesting. The owner wants to redo a driveway, so they were thinking pervious paver bricks. Let's look at a cost comparison vs. rainwater harvesting:

These pavers are the only ones we could find for sale on the internet. They look nice; I might buy them for myself when it's time to replace my driveway. But the owner is concerned about high heels getting stuck in the spaces. And let's compare prices:
1 paver is $28, and covers 32 square INCHES. So you need 4½ to cover a square foot.  That's $125/square foot!



By comparison, an above-ground corrugated steel tank, with the pump and controls necessary to integrate with an irrigation system can be found on the internet for an average of. . .   $1.12/ square foot.



A below-ground steel tank, costs a little more than above-ground, and installation is more. Maybe $3/gallon, installed.

Sure, there's a cost for the space for an above-ground tank. And if you don't already have an irrigation system, you'll need to add that cost. And Home Depot doesn't always have the lowest prices when buying large quantities. But still, $125 vs. $1.12 or $3???

UPDATE:  Received some immediate feedback on this blog entry. Pervious pavers on commercial jobs are available for $8 - 18/square foot. Still, rainwater harvesting is much, much less expensive.

Saturday, July 19, 2014

Inventory Is In!



The first US shipment of Intewa Purain filters is in stock.  We have 4" - 12" Purain rainwater prefilters in stock currently, and 16" is available soon. We have the level indicators also. 



We are looking for reps that want an exclusive market.

Tuesday, May 20, 2014

Stormwater Management Practices - Rainwater Harvesting Is Cheapest By Far

Just finished listening to a presentation of the approved stormwater management techniques approved by the City of Atlanta. Atlanta is requiring that any new construction or remodeling include measures to reduce flooding in the city's creeks and combined sewers.

The costs, according to the presenter:

Green Roof: $20/square foot
Permeable pavement: $14/sf
Bioswale: $7-10/sf*
Rainwater Harvesting:$1/sf

*That's per square foot of permiable space, not per square foot of bioswale.

The rainwater harvesting cost is just the costs associated with reducing the stormwater outflow volume, not using the water. When allocating cost savings, it's best to compare rainwater tank costs with those of other stormwater management practices. Then compare the cost of water treatment and additional piping with the cost of purchasing municipal water for irrigation or other use.

Rainwater harvesting is the least expensive stormwater management technique. And then, it earns a substantial ROI if there is any use for the water.

Wednesday, May 7, 2014

Can Rainwater Harvesting Pay for Itself?

One of the most common questions I hear are wondering whether rainwater harvesting will pay for itself?  The short answer is yes, when engineered with that primary goal, and operated properly.

Why do we need to clarify that ROI is our primary goal? Because when ROI is your primary goal, the following are NOT:
  1. Capturing all, or close to all the rainwater. In many situations, the tanks are sized to collect the first inch of water that hits the roof.  That's fine, but what if we don't NEED that much water? 
  2. Capturing enough rainwater to eliminate potable water used for nonpotable needs, 100% of the time. Or 99%. Or even 95%.  In America, we have an ample supply of water available as backup.  Often, that water is even at the right PRESSURE.
  3. Over treating the water for the application. Either too much treatment, or more treatment capacity (meaning gpm) than necessary.
Looking at the cost for a small system, we'll first look at the most cost-effective uses for rainwater, which is for cooling tower makeup or irrigation. In those two applications typically very little water treatment is required. In the case of cooling tower makeup, it's likely that the water already in the cooling tower is dirtier than the rainwater.

Let's look at the cost for cooling tower make up on a typical building. In the example shown we have a filter that costs about $2000 on the inlet to the tank. The tank itself costs about $20,000 and then the pumping for either irrigation or cooling tower make up about $5000 or $7000. Total: 27,000 for an irrigation system.

The energy cost to pump the water to about 50 psi 6 hours per week for 40 weeks a year comes to about $85 per year at current rates. We estimated a 5 percent energy cost increase per year.

The water saved looking is about 500,000 gallons of water saved per year at a cost of 1.24 cents per gallon comes to about $6200 per year. We projected increases of 8% per year.

This example is based on Northern Virginia where we could find the energy cost, water cost, and impact fees.

Stormwater management fees are calculated differently in different areas. One popular model is to estimate an average amount of impervious surface of a residence, and charge a certain amount for that "block" of impervious surface. Businesses are charged for the number of blocks.  In this example, and another popular method, is to charge based on assessed value. We estimated a $5,000,000 value for the building, and the current charge is 22.441 cents/$1000 assessed value. $1122 per year today, and we estimated an 8% annual increase.

Running through the numbers for this example, we come up with about a 22% annual rate of return, or about 4x the rate of return for the stock market.

Why such an attractive ROI? DURABILITY. These are not light bulbs that fail in 2-3 years. Consider: the WARRANTY on a tank from Georgia Water Tanks is 20 years, including labor. Pumps typically last 10 - 20 years when sized correctly. Controls "never" fail, especially modern controls that have fewer mechanical switches.  We conservatively estimated the total life at 20 years, and included $1000/year in maintenance parts and labor.

To summarize: the most important strategies for cost-effective rainwater harvesting.
  1. Cooling tower makeup and spray irrigation.
  2. Above-ground tank.
  3. Prefilter before tank. No other filtration. 
  4. Full-sized standby water connection, which bypasses the rainwater pump. 
Used effectively, rainwater harvesting with products from GEORGIA WATER TANKS can be a sound financial investment, in addition to helping conserve the world's second-most precious resource. 

Sunday, March 30, 2014

Maximizing Payback

A contractor recently asked me what kind of paybacks we see with rainwater harvesting. Some suppliers say that there is NO payback, and from what I've seen of their product, I would agree! But I'm seeing paybacks as short as 5 years, which is pretty good on equipment with a 20 year WARRANTY. The elements that make for fast payback are:

1. Lots of nonpotable demand. Cooling tower makeup and irrigation are best candidates. How much is the landscaping worth, if there's another total watering ban? In Atlanta, we've had 2 summers in the past 20 years where outside watering was totally banned. Can we assume a 10% annual likelihood in the future?

2. Minimal piping. Locate the tank close to the piping. Stay out from behind walls. Until rainwater is generally approved as a potable water source, we will have to steer clear of using it for toilet flushing when retrofitting. Just too much labor installing a second set of piping.

3. High water costs. Atlanta's are the highest in the country, and are expected to continue to rise at 5-10% per year for the foreseeable future.

4. High impervious surface charges. Atlanta doesn't have these YET, but Gwinnett, Dekalb, East Point, and others do. 

5. High sewage costs. Some areas allow you to eliminate the sewage costs for cooling towers and irrigation, and some don't. Dekalb no longer offers separate irrigation meters. . . they need the money!

6. Use the right equipment. Above ground tanks are now $1-2/ gallon. Below ground tanks can run $4/gallon or more, depending on installation. How much granite is in the ground in Atlanta???

Yaskawa IQ Drives replace control panels. No treatment for cooling tower or irrigation. The submersible well pump in a sleeve design has been replaced with rainwater-specific submersible pumps. Piping to the tank can now go through the base, eliminating the need for heat tracing pipes. 

7. Does the owner value environmental responsibility? The above-ground tanks show customers and employees a conservation mindset. It might translate into more sales or motivated employees. 

Have you evaluated a project and found the payback period to be excessive? Send us the numbers, we love to value engineer.

~R